twentyfourteen domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/gcsar.gov.sy/httpdocs/en/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131Ghada Khalel Ahmad<\/strong> Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n This research\u00a0 was conducted to characterize and evaluate of some Wild Cicer <\/em>species to use it in genetic improvement programs, so eight annual wild species of chickpea\u00a0 was evaluated under rainfed conditions, from each Wild species were used tow \u00a0genotypes and Cicer<\/em> arietinum<\/em> was used as a check\u00a0 and these species are : C.pinnatifidum<\/em> ,C. echinospermum , C. bijugum<\/em>, C.yamashitae , C.reticulatum, C. judaicum,<\/em> C.chorassanicum, C.cuneatum, <\/em>this experiment was planted in Izrah research station which belongs to General Commotion for Agriculture Scientific Research in Complete Randomized Blook Design\u00a0 (RCBD) planted in growth season \u00a02011-2012, and phonological , morphological, and productive traits was studied, during experiment three wild species didn’t germinate which are: C.cuneatum<\/em>, C.chrorassanicum<\/em>, C.yamashitea<\/em>, perhaps due to thickness of covering seed in this genotypes, \u00a0resulted showed check was superior in most studied traits in comparison to wild genotypes, so chick generated earlier (21.3 day) than other genotypes, C.judaicum <\/em>\u00a0was late (50day), for flowering date tow genotypes of C.reticulatum1,2<\/em> were early in flowering (55.3day) but without any significant variations in comparison to check (62.3day), we can use these tow\u00a0 genotypes in genetic improvement programs to get earlier\u00a0 cultivars in flowering ,<\/strong> for days to pods formation C<\/em>. reticulatum1<\/em> was early without any significant variances in comparison to check (70.7day), while the check maturated early (93.3day) and showed significant variances with rest genotypes exception C<\/em>.reticulatu<\/em>m<\/em>,<\/strong> so we can use this genotype in genetic improvement programs to get early\u00a0 verities in maturity which is important adaption traits\u00a0 in arid and semi-arid areas to avoid \u00a0terminal drought and high temperature at end growth season, for plant height C.pinnatifidum2 <\/em>had higher plant height (38cm)than other genotyps without significant variances with check, while C.judaicum2<\/em> had less plant height(13.3cm) because of prostrate growth habit with significant variances with rest of genotypic in plant width (36.7cm), for first pod height check (17.3cm) recorded only significant variances with C.judaicum1,2<\/em>,\u00a0 for number stems check showed significant variances with wild\u00a0 genotypes C.pinnatifidum<\/em>, C.echinospermum,<\/em> C<\/em>.judaicum<\/em>. check was superior in most productive traits and showed significant variances in comparison to wild genotypes\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0exception C.reticulatum <\/em>check had(49.3) number of peduncle per plant and C.reticulatum<\/em> (37pod) in number pods per plant. C.judaicum1<\/em> had less number pods\u00a0 (2pod), \u00a0and also check was superior in number seeds per plant (37seed) without any significant variance with C.echinospermum<\/em> (24seed), C.reticulatum1,<\/em>2<\/em> (29.3, 30),and check was superior in grain yield plant (19.3 g) and also in weigh 100 seed (37.3g) , while C<\/em>.judaicum\u00a0 <\/em>had lower value with significant rise 94.5% comparison with check.<\/p>\n While the correlation study was significant negative 5% between days to flowering with weigh 100 seed (r=-0.40) and grain yield(r=-0.42)and significant positive1% between days to maturity and plant height(r=-0.71), and number of peduncle per plant(r=-0.62), and number pods per plant(r=-0.54), and weigh 100 seed (r=-0.58)and grain yield(r=-0.56), the main reason to this negative relationships is late in germination consequently late in maturity that expose plants to unsuitable conditions that effect in most productive traits. The relationship was significant positive 1% between number of peduncle per plant with number pods per plant (r=0.93), and number seeds per plant(r=0.90), and\u00a0 weigh 100 seed (r=-0.66), grain yield per plant(r=0.67), The relationship was significant positive 1% between number pods per plant with number seeds per plant(r=0.95), and weigh 100 seed(r=0.57), grain yield plant (r=0.65), significant positive 1% between number seeds per plant with weigh 100 seed(r=0.69), and (r=0.79) with grain yield plant, significant positive 1% between weigh 100 seed and grain yield plant(r=0.94).<\/p>\n According to the study of the regression relations for future predication of one variable value according to the other variable value depending on the correlation which already exists between them, While regression was studied only significant relations which use to determine the percentage independent factor (x) with dependent factor (y), we reach that genetic improvement programs to reach early germination led to early flowering (66%) and early pods formation(53%) and early maturity (62%), genetic improvement programs which doing in increasing number of peduncles per plant led to increasing number pods per plant (88%)and (79%) number seeds per plant, and increasing number seeds per plant led to increase grain yield plant (62%).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ghada Khalel Ahmad General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research \u060cGeneBank Department Faculty of Agriculture,Damascus University, 2015 Abstract This research\u00a0 was conducted to characterize and evaluate of some Wild Cicer species to use it in genetic improvement programs, so eight annual wild species of chickpea\u00a0 was evaluated under rainfed conditions, from each Wild species were used … Continue reading Characterizations and Evaluation of Some Wild Species of Chickpea (Cicer spp.) and their Importance in Genetic Improvement Programs<\/span>
\nGeneral Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research \u060cGeneBank Department<\/strong>
\nFaculty of Agriculture,Damascus University, <\/strong>
\n2015<\/strong><\/p>\n